Doc
Specialist 
Posts: 549
|
Post by Doc on Feb 7, 2006 22:07:48 GMT -5
HERES THE SITUATION, YOU CAN EITHER MOUNT IT OR CARRY IT, U HAVE NO LIMIT ON AMMO, YOUR PINNED DOWN BEHIND GOOD COVER, YOU CAN'T MOVE, WHICH DO YOU CHOOSE, EXPLAIN WHY
|
|
Doc
Specialist
Posts: 549
|
Post by Doc on Feb 7, 2006 22:08:51 GMT -5
M60 E3 BETTER ROF, BIG ROUND, AND JUST SO DAMN COOL
|
|
|
|
Post by Colonel on Feb 8, 2006 14:54:22 GMT -5
armour piercing .30-06, selective fast or slow cyclic rate of fire, decent accuracy, and style.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colonel on Feb 8, 2006 14:55:17 GMT -5
i would the take the BAR, in the post above this. forgot to add that.
|
|
Doc
Specialist
Posts: 549
|
Post by Doc on Feb 8, 2006 16:48:51 GMT -5
WHY HAS NO ONE PICKED THE SAW
|
|
AngelofDeath215
Reserve 
Specialist Angel of Death
Fuck Milsim kids
Posts: 56
|
Post by AngelofDeath215 on Feb 11, 2006 22:31:40 GMT -5
well, i would have to chose the original m60, you can fire more rounds before a barrel change and its lighter than all the other guns (exept the e3 and the saw) but the e3 i hate, and the saw dosent fire a big enough round, the mg42 is too heavy and is not made to fire fromm the hip or while your holding it (unless you have a special glove or somthing). the m2, well wtf would you need an m2 for, ud get killed just trying to set it up. a vulcan has the moving barrels so you can not rest it on cover, the bar would be a good choice as well, but with a 20 round magazine you cannot fire very long before you must reload, and the rpk is a ruskie gun so fuck that haha. while all of the guns are good choices the m60 is just my personal prefrance. the e3 is ok i guess, but its a failed attempt, to improve a failed attempt to copy an mg42.
|
|
|
|
Post by dsbond on Feb 11, 2006 23:40:39 GMT -5
MG42 - getting too hot?? Hold on to the bipod. Get some.
|
|
Doc
Specialist
Posts: 549
|
Post by Doc on Feb 12, 2006 9:04:22 GMT -5
WHO THE FUCK PICKED THE .50, WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME U EVER SAW AN M2 THAT WASN'T MOUNTED ON ON A VEHICLE, AND AS FOR THE VULCAN, EVEN IF YOU HAD THE TRIPOD, THE RECOIL WOULD JUST KNOCK IT DOWN. I STILL THINK THE RPK WITH A DRUM MAG MAY NOT BE A BAD IDEA, BESIDES, THEN EVERYONE IS SHOOTING THE SAME AMMO SHOULD YOU RUN OUT.
|
|
|
|
Post by dsbond on Feb 12, 2006 13:54:53 GMT -5
I was shown the m2 on the floor of essentially a gymnasium. Not mounted on anything unless you count the floor.
|
|
Doc
Specialist
Posts: 549
|
Post by Doc on Feb 12, 2006 14:29:51 GMT -5
I was shown the m2 on the floor of essentially a gymnasium. Not mounted on anything unless you count the floor. yeah... but if you went to fire it it would skid across the floor |
|
|
|
Post by dsbond on Feb 12, 2006 14:41:32 GMT -5
Nah, sick bastards designed it to be deployed on a tripod - weighs a ton also.
|
|
Doc
Specialist
Posts: 549
|
Post by Doc on Feb 12, 2006 23:10:49 GMT -5
REALLY?
|
|
|
|
Post by Colonel on Apr 17, 2006 11:06:04 GMT -5
heh BAR man. all about the BAR.
|
|
Doc
Specialist
Posts: 549
|
Post by Doc on Apr 17, 2006 12:23:17 GMT -5
i'm liking the rpk still, high power big round, plus a shit load of ammo all around you (unless u are fighting the us or some non third wolrd country) and, it looks cool
|
|
|
|
Post by Colonel on Apr 17, 2006 13:04:53 GMT -5
it does look cool, but finding an affordable platform to build one off of is tough. most brands (UTG excluded) are pretty expensive for a good quality AK. my advice is to get the UTG, beef up the internals, get a longer barrel (RPK's had longer barrels right dave?) and either a huge banana mag (the long kind) or a snail drum. of course a bipod would be necessary.
get some
|
|
